PPL vs PRS: What's Actually the Difference?

They're two separate organisations, licensing two separate things, and understanding the difference actually makes the whole topic of music licensing much less confusing.

TLDR: PRS for Music licenses the song. PPL licenses the recording of the song.

Find out more about our background music for business solutions.

‍

PRS for Music: the song itself.

PRS represents songwriters, composers, and publishers. What they license is the underlying composition - the melody, the lyrics, the actual piece of music as it was written, independent of any particular version of it.

Every time that composition gets performed or played publicly, whoever wrote it is entitled to be paid for it. That's true whether it's the original recording, a cover version, a live band playing it in a pub, or a talented busker giving it a go on the high street. PRS exists to collect on behalf of the writer, in all of those cases.

‍

PPL: the specific recording.

PPL represents performers and record labels. What they license isn't the song as an abstract piece of music - it's a specific recorded version of it. The actual performance, captured and released.

So if you're playing the original studio recording of a track through your speakers, that particular recording has its own set of rights, separate from the song underneath it. The performers on that recording, and the label that released it, are entitled to be paid whenever that specific recording is played publicly.

‍

Why there are two of you needing to pay, not one.

It comes down to there being two different copyrights sitting inside a single piece of recorded music: copyright in the composition, and copyright in the sound recording. PRS was set up in 1914 to manage the first. PPL followed in 1934 to manage the second. Different organisations, different eras, different rights - and for most of the last century, businesses genuinely needed a licence from each of them separately to stay legal.

That's the bit that trips most people up now, because it's no longer quite how it works in practice.

‍

Where TheMusicLicence fits in.

PPL and PRS for Music now jointly operate under PPL PRS Ltd, and most UK businesses playing music sort both through a single product: TheMusicLicence. One licence, one invoice, one point of contact - but underneath it, PPL and PRS are still two separate organisations, still setting their own tariffs independently, and still paying out to two different groups of people (performers/labels on one side, writers/publishers on the other).

The organisations are genuinely distinct. The way most businesses interact with them, today, has been simplified into one.

‍

The mix-up worth avoiding.

The most common misconception isn't "which one do I need" - it's assuming that because they're now bundled into one licence, they must be the same thing, or that having "a music licence" from one automatically covers the other. It doesn't work that way. TheMusicLicence covers both because PPL and PRS agreed to offer it jointly, not because the underlying rights merged.